bem at cmc.net
Sat Oct 24 16:15:36 CEST 1998
On Sat, Oct 24, 1998 at 02:16:42PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> Nope, it's ElGamel 17.
> The packet is signed and encrypted is the problem... (Even though you're
> supposed to sign encrypted data.)
> The public key is below.
> Still need to figure out what PGP's problem is with it.
Ah, I see: from the draft OpenPGP spec:
* Neither PGP 5.x nor PGP 6.0 recognize Elgamal Encrypt and Sign
keys. They only handle Elgamal Encrypt-only keys.
Looks like I need to make a subkey to appease PGP5.
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Netscum, Bane of Elves. Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster
More information about the Gnupg-devel