GnuPG and trailing whitespace handling

Werner Koch wk at
Wed Feb 10 11:09:13 CET 1999

Russ Allbery <rra at> writes:

> It sounds to me like your implementation is correct according to the RFC,
> and I think it's a considerably saner way of handling things anyway.  I

After looking at my code I detected a /*fixme: ... */ which indicates
that there is still a problem which is not easy to solve (does mode
't' always implies sigclass 0x01? We need to know this in case that
there is no one-pass signature packet).



ceterum censeo RSA esse delendam

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list