Possible GPGME bug
marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Thu Nov 1 13:41:00 CET 2007
At Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:37:52 -0400,
"Adam Schreiber" <sadam at clemson.edu> wrote:
> In fixing a bug in Seahorse, I found that our feature to revoke a sub
> key was no longer working. It uses the gpgme_op_edit API. I checked
> the challenge and responses of gpg --edit-key manually and found that
> they matched those our state machine expected.
Did you check using the same arguments to gpg for invocation? GPGME
adds a whole bunch of arguments to the command line (check with ps).
More information about the Gnupg-devel