Default encryption key algo
John W. Moore III
jmoore3rd at bellsouth.net
Mon May 11 23:55:18 CEST 2009
Werner Koch wrote:
> The next question is whether to use Elgamal or RSA as the standard
> encryption subkey for a new key. Currently it is Elgamal. They are
> both okay: Elgamal needs to be supported anyway becuase it is a MUST
> algorithm in OpenPGP and RSA can be used because the primary key will be
> RSA and an implementation without RSA support won't be able to use an
> Elgamal subkey either.
> I have a slight preference towards RSA because that allows to transfer
> the key to a smartcard. Given that subkeys are easily changeable it is
> not a real advantage, though.
> Any opinions? What is PGP's default?
Having no clue as to PGP's current 'default' I can only express My
Personal Opinion. That is that I feel that Elgamal, bit for bit, is
'stronger' but I cannot expressly defend that at present. :-\
Timestamp: Monday 11 May 2009, 17:54 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 654 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-devel