gpgme 1.30 fails when tested with gnupg 2.0.17

Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever.fta at gmail.com
Thu Apr 28 23:00:11 CEST 2011


2011-04-28 00:26:24 Marcus Brinkmann napisał(a):
> On 04/27/2011 03:39 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> > Hi;
> > 
> > Testing gpgme 1.30 with gnupg 2.0.17 fails in t-encrypt-sign test:
> > 
> > Wrong hash algorithm reported: 3
> > FAIL: t-encrypt-sign
> > 
> > The test expects SHA1 but the message is signed with RMD160. According to
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362645 test passes with gnupg 2.0.16
> > which I didn't verify myself personally.
> > 
> > Only suspicious commit is
> > http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=commitdiff;h=398e686085fd40ea3d20e99ff5c83ef27626f1abbut
> > I am not sure if its the culprit.
> 
> Yeah I know, I checked in an update to the test suite yesterday, which is
> targeted towards GnuPG 2.1, and that should fix this one (but as I didn't test
> GnuPG 2.0 yet, there may be other problems remaining).

Backporting of whole http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpgme.git;a=commitdiff;h=43f38db1afe9830b888076adeec1eec21f32335c
to gpgme 1.3.0 fixes t-encrypt-sign, but breaks t-import:
...
PASS: t-export
Unexpected status 17
FAIL: t-import
PASS: t-trustlist
...

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110428/fe35b72b/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list