Strange gpgme_sigsum_t value in gpgme (bug?)
matthias at nlinux.org
Tue Jun 14 19:54:58 CEST 2011
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:39:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 12:32 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> I'm new to GPGMe, so this maybe is a foolish question, but I stumbled
>> a very weird behavior of GPGMe, which cause my application to act very,
>> very weird :P
>> Is this a bug, or am I just doing it wrong?
> I believe the field is a bitfield, so the flags are additive.
> 0x03 == 0x02 + 0x01
> So that means GPGME_SIGSUM_VALID + GPGME_SIGSUM_GREEN
Oo... Thanks! I'm using GPGMe via Vala, maybe this brought me on the wrong
track (the vapi file for GPGMe is buggy, I'm ficing it at time)
Sorry for the noise and thanks again for your help!
More information about the Gnupg-devel