suggestions surrounding key generating
   
    Stefan H. Holek
     
    stefan@epy.co.at
       
    Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:31:41 +0100 (CET)
    
    
  
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Frank Tobin wrote:
> The expiration is stored in a self-signatures.  Signatures are considered
> additive by keyservers, so one can have multiple expirations on one key.
> How the OpenPGP implementation handles multiple situations is up to the
> implementation, if I'm not mistaken.  Two reasonable choices could be
> made; consider only the shortest expiration, or consider the expiration
> that was most recently created.
Here is what the RFC says:
I finally found the stuff ;)
5.2.4.1. Subpacket Hints
   ...
   It is certainly possible for a signature to contain conflicting
   information in subpackets. For example, a signature may contain
   multiple copies of a preference or multiple expiration times. In
   most cases, an implementation SHOULD use the last subpacket in the
   signature, but MAY use any conflict resolution scheme that makes
   more sense. Please note that we are intentionally leaving conflict
   resolution to the implementer; most conflicts are simply syntax
   errors, and the wishy-washy language here allows a receiver to be
   generous in what they accept, while putting pressure on a creator to
   be stingy in what they generate.
-- 
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org