Questions regarding "Web of Trust"

[Ingo Klöcker]

--Boundary-02=_nnVx95HhCttYuq1
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 01 November 2002 06:24, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Armin Herbert wrote:
> > Because I had problems with KMail (either it's only accepting
> > ultimately trusted keys for encrypting mail or it also wants a high
> > owner trust value to do so, I'm not quite sure yet)
>
> If it does so, it is broken. It makes sense to accept only _valid_
> keys (or have a big fat warning and user confirmation for invalid
> keys), but not to ask owner trust for encrypting to a key.

KMail is of course not broken and yes currently it only allows 
encryption with valid keys. As always the correct wording with respect 
to valid/trusted might be confusing but the owner trust is definitely 
not checked by KMail.

Regards,
Ingo


--Boundary-02=_nnVx95HhCttYuq1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9xVnnGnR+RTDgudgRAkojAKCTYm9HlxMAxdklxTkv2rei02g4lgCgs3nI
0y43bbpP3+hbad63P4INQPE=
=HY/Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_nnVx95HhCttYuq1--