Implications of using insecure memory
malte.gell at gmx.de
Mon Oct 4 19:49:13 CEST 2004
On Monday 04 October 2004 04:56, shatadal at vfemail.net wrote:
> Quoting Atom 'Smasher' <atom at suspicious.org>:
> > i dunno about windoze, but on *nix you can solve this by setuid-ing
> > the gpg binary... that would force it to only use secure memory
> > (RAM) and not write to disk swap.
> I use windows. Does that mean that I should not use gpg on windows?
> Or should I install some utility to wipe the disc swap space and use
> it every time after I have used gpg? Could you point me to any
> program which does this?
You can tell Windows to clean the swap file with a simple registry
But this is really only a minor issue concerning the severe
vulnerabilities that emerged over the last few years.
More information about the Gnupg-users