Create key's over 4096 bit ????
mlisten at hammernoch.net
Thu Dec 22 10:47:24 CET 2005
On 22.12.2005 10:35 Uhr, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> - And even from a cryptographic point of view this wouldn't make sense
>> (as far as I know), as currently hashfunctions are the weak point of the
>> whole system.
> That depends on what you consider important. Hash functions are only used
> for signing;
Ack. And for protection of the private key.
> for encryption, currently the 256 bit algo's are the strongest.
Please don't mix symmetrical encryption strength (I suppose you are
referring to the session key length/encryption algo) with asymmetrical
A chain is only as strong as its weakest element.
BTW: Sorry for first replying via PM
More information about the Gnupg-users