[Announce] release candidate for 1.4.1 available
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Thu Feb 3 22:38:21 CET 2005
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:21:39PM -0500, Charly Avital wrote:
> > * New --rfc2440-text option which controls how text is handled in
> > signatures. This is in response to some problems seen with
> > certain PGP/MIME mail clients and GnuPG version 1.4.0. More
> > details about this are available at
> > <http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-January/
> > 024408.html>
> Self-test correctly verified by two different MUAs that use gpg. When
> verifying with PGP 8.1, bad signature (will inform the PGP people).
I'm not sure what didn't work here. What did you verify with PGP 8.1?
> > * New "import-unusable-sigs" and "export-unusable-sigs" tags for
> > --import-options and --export-options. These are on by
> > default, and cause GnuPG to not import or export key signatures
> > that are not usable (e.g. expired signatures).
> The wording is a bit confusing, *for me* that is:
> if the tag --import-unusable-sigs is on by default, how will that cause
> GnuPG *not* to import key signatures that are not usable? It would seem
> that it would cause GnuPG to import key signatures that are not usable.
> Ditto for export. Sorry if this sounds dense.
This was a typo. The options are *off* by default.
More information about the Gnupg-users