This IS about GD - a proposal on dealing with the problem
zwon at severodvinsk.ru
Sat Sep 10 22:28:57 CEST 2005
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:00:38PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Ok, that other thread isn't about the GD, but this one is. I think this
> is something that should be discussed and a consensus reached.
> Are they a good/bad signer?
> Does something need to be done about them?
> Should they be approached by the community?
> Signature cleaning and/or filtering is not the answer, just as spam
> filtering is not the ultimate answer. The cost to the IT industry of
> spam filtering is enormous. Let's deal with the problem at the source.
I think this is public more keyservers design problem than GD. Keyserver
should accept new signatures only from key owner.
Pawel I. Shajdo
More information about the Gnupg-users