aongenae at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 17:22:21 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I hope that the others bank do have such security consideration and
don't send clear message with their consultant !
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 16:43, Harakiri <harakiri_23 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Anyone else is really frightend by this question and prays that your bank is not part of those that this guy is consulting?
> --- On Tue, 8/5/08, proxy <ganeshyz at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> From: proxy <ganeshyz at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Multiple clients
>> To: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
>> Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 10:27 PM
>> Hello, I am trying to understand the Best Practice for the
>> follwing situation
>> We have 5 bankers and we are going to receive encrypted
>> bank statements from
>> them. Now the question here is should we need to have
>> Separate Public Keys
>> for each bank (and corresponding Private keys) i.e. 5
>> different public keys
>> OR for all the Bankers we are going to use one single
>> public key for our
>> whole orgranization?
>> Which approach we need to follow? What are all the Pros and
>> cons of the
>> above two designs? any other approach is available?
>> appreciate your help.
>> View this message in context:
>> Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at
>> Gnupg-users mailing list
>> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
More information about the Gnupg-users