Need recommendation on keyserver code
aolsen at standard.com
Thu May 8 23:49:39 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Alan Olsen wrote:
>> Those patches do not fix my build problems. (It is running out of
>> memory compiling numerix.ml.)
>Odd. I built it again before sending the patches, on an up to date Fedora 8 box (i386).
> It did compile. I didn't test any further though.
I believe the problem has to do with the version of OCAML I am using. 3.10.1 seems to have problems. 3.10.2 has been released. I am going to try that. I am also using x86_64 and that may have something to do with it.
>> Your patches are also for a much earlier version of numerix.
>Yeah, the numerix patch was against the version of numerix included in the sks tarball.
> Packaging numerix and making sks use the system numerix would be better (if possible),
> but it wasn't something I looked at.
The patch takes a bit to apply. The code still needs patching at that point in the code. The code location has changed quite a bit though.
>> I have sent mail to the SKS author to see if he has any ideas.
>Good luck. :)
Probably need it. It has been a chore to get anything working with SKS. Probably since I am using a version of Fedora 9 out of Rawhide...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users