Computational Efficiency of GnuPG ciphers and hashes
Robert J. Hansen
rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Mon Oct 6 21:01:23 CEST 2008
Kevin Hilton wrote:
> Its often been mentioned on this mailing list, that 3DES is
> notoriously slow. On the flipside, what cipher is considered the
> fastest -- or the most computationally efficient (if this term even
> applies)? Are there similar relative results among the GnuPG hashes?
AES is the clear winner, with Twofish a close second.
More information about the Gnupg-users