add subkey vs generate new set?

Werewolf werewolf6851 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 00:01:22 CEST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Another Pondering as every year need bigger bit sized keys to be secure
Benefits and Cons

Wondering if adding a bigger encryption/signing sub keys to current key
on keyserver leaves the benefit keeping the same finger print? So don't
have inform all your corresondences to get a new key from you?  They
just have --refresh their public keyrings
  Over
Just setting old key to expire and Generate a new set, collect
signatures again, change info on web pages and/or bussiness cards?


- --

Werewolf
=======================================
  http://spandex31095.tripod.com/
  Skype: Werewolf6851
===== Instant Messenger Accounts ======
 Yahoo: lover_of_lycra
   ICQ: 304325894
   MSN: lover_of_lycra at hotmail.com
   AIM: LycraloverWolf
=======================================
 GPG key 76E6C1BC with following fingerprint
D508 2C9D B3A9 2F0E E472  95A8 2D8C B9E6 76E6 C1BC
=======================================
Inara: "What should I do?"

Simon: (hands her bandages): "Tie it off."

Inara: "Simon, I'm good with anatomy, but not like this..."
				--Unfilmed Episode, "Dead or Alive"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Portable Thunderbird version 2.0.0.17 (20080914)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkj3ubIACgkQLYy55nbmwbxmAgCdETbweCy8Yz4ST+r6peRJPnqD
EHUAoMtPtPKg3ntgrPxvxcVfiAdwCRER
=i70a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list