michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon Apr 19 16:54:37 CEST 2004
On Monday 19 April 2004 16:34, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> This seems spurious. Maybe putc_unlocked is only defined as a macro
> on BSD, and thus circumvents the autoconf tests? This would sound
> broken to me (it may be allowed to define it as a macro, but it should
> still be defined as a function in the library).
Yes, it's a macro. However, I don't see what's wrong about that other than
making autoconf's life harder.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040419/b3d07f34/attachment.bin
More information about the Gpa-dev