another question, and a small patch

[Werner Koch]

On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:

> a new list containing all of them. So if they're actually release()'d,
> it's not a good thing :-)

Well that might be the reason that gcry_sexp_release was a dummy ;-)

Frankly, my plan is to first check wether this S-Exp really work and
don't impose too much parsing overhead.  The nice thing with S-Exp is
that we don't need to change the API when a new PK algorithm is
introduced.

> I notice there's a comment at the top takling about implementing
> refcounting... is this something that's needed? It might be overkill

I know about the shallow copy issues, so ref-counting seems to be so
only easy way to cope with it. 

  werner
 
-- 
Werner Koch				OpenPGP key 621CC013
OpenIT GmbH                             tel +49 211 239577-0
Birkenstr. 12                           email   wk@OpenIT.de
D-40233 Duesseldorf                     http://www.OpenIT.de