[RFC PATCH v2] Initial implementation of GCM
dbaryshkov at gmail.com
Mon Nov 11 14:02:30 CET 2013
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna at iki.fi> wrote:
> On 08.11.2013 16:08, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
>> On 08.11.2013 15:43, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
>>> On 08.11.2013 12:03, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>>> +#define GHASH(c, result, buf) ghash (result, buf, c->gcm_table);
>>> Following is faster:
>> But does not work on big-endian :P
> I ended up doing small patch-set on top of this patch, which adds more optimized
> versions of generic ghash for 32-bit (~33 cpb on Cortex-A8) and 64-bit machines
> (~11 cpb on Intel Haswell, ~16 on Intel Core2). I've also added Intel PCLMUL
> acceleration which gets GCM-auth to ~0.83 cpb on haswell.
> Patches are at
> So, do we make v3 of this initial implementation and rebase these patches on it
> or do I push v2 and these patches to repo and we'll work on from there?
I'm unsure about generate_iv/set_iv argument. More on that here:
I'm fine with pushing this version of patches (I have to write proper
+ your patches on top of that (have you tested big-endian? I can
execute tests on G5
in a few hours).
With best wishes
More information about the Gcrypt-devel