GOST ECC pubkey
dbaryshkov at gmail.com
Wed Oct 2 17:09:14 CEST 2013
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:33, gniibe at fsij.org said:
>> I think that it is possible to represent GOST3410 without extending
>> the structure ecc_domain_parms_t. Just redefine "n" as order of
>> cyclic subgroup of elliptic curve points group for GOST3410.
> Anyone else with comments?
> I haven't read the specs, if it is different to ECDSA we might want to
> add another signature scheme similar to the (flag eddsa).
I have sent a patch a few days ago. It just adds a (flag gost) to the data
and signature s-exps. There is no difference with ECDSA in the keys
With best wishes
More information about the Gcrypt-devel