Are we ready for 1.7 ?

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Fri Apr 8 15:22:33 CEST 2016


On Fri,  8 Apr 2016 10:31, gniibe at fsij.org said:

> I encountered this issue when I wrote tests/t-cv25519.c.  If we keep
> current API, the user would be confused.  That's my concern.

Depends on what the user wants to do.

> diff --git a/mpi/ec.c b/mpi/ec.c
> index 26dd947..b253f72 100644
> --- a/mpi/ec.c
> +++ b/mpi/ec.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include "context.h"
>  #include "ec-context.h"
>  #include "ec-internal.h"
> +#include "cipher.h"

Including cipher.h is not good because it mixes the MPI computations
with the cipher operations. 


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.




More information about the Gcrypt-devel mailing list