Are we ready for 1.7 ?
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Fri Apr 8 15:22:33 CEST 2016
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:31, gniibe at fsij.org said:
> I encountered this issue when I wrote tests/t-cv25519.c. If we keep
> current API, the user would be confused. That's my concern.
Depends on what the user wants to do.
> diff --git a/mpi/ec.c b/mpi/ec.c
> index 26dd947..b253f72 100644
> --- a/mpi/ec.c
> +++ b/mpi/ec.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include "context.h"
> #include "ec-context.h"
> #include "ec-internal.h"
> +#include "cipher.h"
Including cipher.h is not good because it mixes the MPI computations
with the cipher operations.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gcrypt-devel
mailing list