LGPL vs. OCB license

Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka at siemens.com
Wed Dec 20 07:19:42 CET 2017

On 2017-12-15 21:26, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:17, ametzler at bebt.de said:
>> OpenSSL is in a different situation than everybody else, they got a
>> special OCB license without the additional restrictions on top of the
>> OpenSSL license.
> According to private discussions this was on their explicit request to
> make it really clear.  It has already been suggested to the OpenPGP WG
> that we could ask for an explicit license for the OpenPGP protocol.  Why
> not also ask for a similar special license for Libgcrypt?  Well, that
> might end up with explicit licenses for all free software libraries.

That would be the clearest license, of course. Are you planning to try
this, or who could do this?


Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

More information about the Gcrypt-devel mailing list