[PATCH v2] mceliece6688128f: fix stack overflow crash on win64/wine
Jacob Bachmeyer
jcb62281 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 01:23:20 CEST 2025
On 9/28/25 02:56, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> On 28/09/2025 04:33, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcrypt-devel wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Would this make sense as "const unsigned int sizeof_mat" to enable
>> better compiler optimizations/inlining since PK_NROWS and nblocks_H
>> seem to be constants? Or is GCC able to deduce that sizeof_mat is
>> only assigned once?
>
> With GCC -O0, "unsigned int sizeof_mat" and "const unsigned int
> sizeof_mat" generate the same code, value is assigned to stack memory.
> With -O1 and above, compiler deduces that this is constant variable
> and optimizes as it sees best fit. 'const' on stack variables only
> really affects syntax checks and gives compile-time error when trying
> reassigning to that variable.
So GCC does recognize constants and optimize accordingly. Good. Why not
include the "const" as well to ensure that a compile-time error will be
thrown if any future code attempts to change the value, since there is
no way that such code could be correct?
-- Jacob
More information about the Gcrypt-devel
mailing list