[git] GnuPG - branch, master, updated. gnupg-2.1.16-28-gf6728d1
by Daniel Kahn Gillmor
cvs at cvs.gnupg.org
Tue Nov 29 14:37:30 CET 2016
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "The GNU Privacy Guard".
The branch, master has been updated
via f6728d13e8e544dbd4b9351ed981613e5504293f (commit)
from ecc126a7cef371e3b88e65715ba37fb77e92ea0f (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit f6728d13e8e544dbd4b9351ed981613e5504293f
Author: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Mon Oct 31 19:52:31 2016 -0400
dirmngr: Lazily launch ldap reaper thread.
* dirmngr/dirmngr.c (main): Avoid calling ldap_wrapper_launch_thread()
Before we need it.
* dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c (ldap_wrapper): Call
ldap_wrapper_launch_thread() just in time (before any attempt to use
an ldap subprocess).
--
A dirmngr process that never looks anything up in LDAP has no need for
a reaper thread, but one was started automatically. This thread wakes
up every two seconds to look for ldap processes that might never have
been running. We won't start more than one reaper thread for any
given dirmngr due to the static int "done" in
ldap_wrapper_launch_thread(), so it's safe to call this every time
there is a use of ldap_wrapper.
If someone wants to do further dirmngr optimizations for ldap users,
the reaper thread itself could use dynamically-calculated timeouts
(and probably needs to be alerted dynamically when a new ldap
subprocess is available so it can re-calculate those timeouts).
Note: It's not clear to me how to test ldap access effectively; i know
of no public ldap services that i can verify against, and i do not run
my own ldap servers. If someone has a publicly-available ldap server
that developers can run tests against, i would be happy to hear about
it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net>
diff --git a/dirmngr/dirmngr.c b/dirmngr/dirmngr.c
index 7214d49..f60173b 100644
--- a/dirmngr/dirmngr.c
+++ b/dirmngr/dirmngr.c
@@ -989,9 +989,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
thread_init ();
cert_cache_init ();
crl_cache_init ();
-#if USE_LDAP
- ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
-#endif /*USE_LDAP*/
http_register_netactivity_cb (netactivity_action);
start_command_handler (ASSUAN_INVALID_FD);
shutdown_reaper ();
@@ -1027,9 +1024,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
thread_init ();
cert_cache_init ();
crl_cache_init ();
-#if USE_LDAP
- ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
-#endif /*USE_LDAP*/
http_register_netactivity_cb (netactivity_action);
handle_connections (3);
assuan_sock_close (3);
@@ -1238,9 +1232,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
thread_init ();
cert_cache_init ();
crl_cache_init ();
-#if USE_LDAP
- ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
-#endif /*USE_LDAP*/
http_register_netactivity_cb (netactivity_action);
handle_connections (fd);
assuan_sock_close (fd);
@@ -1251,9 +1242,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
/* Just list the CRL cache and exit. */
if (argc)
wrong_args ("--list-crls");
-#if USE_LDAP
- ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
-#endif /*USE_LDAP*/
crl_cache_init ();
crl_cache_list (es_stdout);
}
@@ -1267,9 +1255,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
thread_init ();
cert_cache_init ();
crl_cache_init ();
-#if USE_LDAP
- ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
-#endif /*USE_LDAP*/
if (!argc)
rc = crl_cache_load (&ctrlbuf, NULL);
else
@@ -1293,9 +1278,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
thread_init ();
cert_cache_init ();
crl_cache_init ();
-#if USE_LDAP
- ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
-#endif /*USE_LDAP*/
rc = crl_fetch (&ctrlbuf, argv[0], &reader);
if (rc)
log_error (_("fetching CRL from '%s' failed: %s\n"),
diff --git a/dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c b/dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c
index b9931a0..b313848 100644
--- a/dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c
+++ b/dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c
@@ -654,8 +654,9 @@ ldap_wrapper (ctrl_t ctrl, ksba_reader_t *reader, const char *argv[])
only viable solutions are either to have another thread
responsible for logging the messages or to add an option to the
wrapper module to do the logging on its own. Given that we anyway
- need a way to rip the child process and this is best done using a
- general ripping thread, that thread can do the logging too. */
+ need a way to reap the child process and this is best done using a
+ general reaping thread, that thread can do the logging too. */
+ ldap_wrapper_launch_thread ();
*reader = NULL;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
dirmngr/dirmngr.c | 18 ------------------
dirmngr/ldap-wrapper.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
The GNU Privacy Guard
http://git.gnupg.org
More information about the Gnupg-commits
mailing list