DSA and patents

[Werner Koch]

Jon Callas <jon at pgp.com> writes:

> The current draft of OpenPGP allows for Elgamal signatures. It *is* true
> that PGP 5.x does not implement them, but the standard allows them. If
> there's anything in the draft that forbids them, let me know and I'll
> correct it, as I consider that a bug in the spec.

It´s okay, we would only have a problem with the MUST DSA requirement
if we can´t use DSA due to patent issues - according to Peter Gutmann´s
message this will not be the case.

By the way: The bit fiddling stuff with the length headers is somewhat
annoying:  If there is need for partial length headers, the document will
anyway be quite large and spending some extra bytes does matter.  I hope
that can be fixed with next OpenPGP version.

Werner

-- 
Werner Koch, Duesseldorf  -   werner.koch at guug.de   -  PGP keyID: 0C9857A5