Standards and PGP wraper
John A. Martin
jam at jamux.com
Tue Nov 10 15:01:48 CET 1998
>>>>> "dp" == David Pick
>>>>> "Re: Standards and PGP wraper "
>>>>> Tue, 10 Nov 1998 18:37:41 +0000
dp> It's just that I happen to feel that in many ways digital
dp> signatures are more important than the basic encryption,
dp> certainly if they become accepted (as I expect they will) as
dp> legally equivalent to traditional hand-written signatures
dp> sometime in the not-so-distant future.
Is there a problem with using a sign-only key for normal signatures
and using the signing key of a sign-and-encrypt pair only in
conjunction with encrypting?
More information about the Gnupg-devel