--textmode, tiny bug ?

[Markus Gruber]

wk at isil.d.shuttle.de said:
> No, I don't think so:  This is the same behaviour as pgp 2.x if the
> default +clearsign=on is used and may folks requested a somewhat pgp
> like interface.  

> Shall I remove it?

It would be nice to be able to sign nonclear (some call it binary, don´t know 
why) *and* having textmode conversion to network style. I don´t know how to 
say it gpg:
"gpg --clearsign --armor --textmode" does signing clear after textmode 
conversion
"gpg --sign --armor --textmode" does it, too.
"gpg --sign --armor" does nonclear signing ?without? having converted to 
textmode
It would be nice to have that feature.

Thanks
Markus