Making a gpg library

Werner Koch wk@gnupg.org
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:41:39 +0200


On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:


> I do. Not spawning a gpg executable for each message would save a lot of
> CPU time I could use for other things.
Okay. If it is a real pressure for you, than we should change some of the implementation details. Do you have any numbers? BTW, it should already be possible to have gpg sit in the background and feed it with cleartext signatures on which it will respond with GOOD/BAD status messages (since 1.0.4 ;) Werner -- Werner Koch GnuPG key: 621CC013 OpenIT GmbH http://www.OpenIT.de