No GnuPG library for now

[Frank Tobin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Enzo Michelangeli, at 07:40 +0800 on Fri, 20 Oct 2000, wrote:

> For a reply from the real world, see:
> 
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/autofile/www/chapter2_108.html

This is starting to get off-track, but there are two major trains of
thought on the whole issue; we have the 'design' process (a.k.a. Rational
Unified Process, a.k.a. RUP) vs a 'evolutionary' process (a.k.a. Extreme
Programa, a.k.a. XP).  There are heavy debates on both sides of the issue
which is better in the long run, which is better for which things, etc.

Neither should be taken as the gospel truth.

Some of us on the list are simply expressing that GnuPG might benefit from
having a little more of one process than another, given certain demands
from the public.

- -- 
Frank Tobin		http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iEUEARECAAYFAjnvijYACgkQVv/RCiYMT6NDpQCdH7ZMT263WMnmQRnWKcJXHuij
WT4Al2yjG12rV3M+j/ATG3kSjFPujJ0=
=AY/f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----