Making a gpg library
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Oct 23 15:41:39 CEST 2000
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I do. Not spawning a gpg executable for each message would save a lot of
> CPU time I could use for other things.
Okay. If it is a real pressure for you, than we should change some
of the implementation details. Do you have any numbers?
BTW, it should already be possible to have gpg sit in the
background and feed it with cleartext signatures on which it will
respond with GOOD/BAD status messages (since 1.0.4 ;)
Werner Koch GnuPG key: 621CC013
OpenIT GmbH http://www.OpenIT.de
More information about the Gnupg-devel