application/pgp RFC

[Sam Roberts]

--bUstQoaYUbHimb7n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Quoting Nathan Thompson-Amato <ndt@jps.net>, who wrote:
> > On 2000-08-31 17:57:33 -0500, Taral wrote:
> > For guidance on how to implement it, please look at elm-me+ or mutt.
>=20
> But is it worth implementing?  RFC 2015 seems to provide equivalent
> functionality, it's an actual RFC, and (this is the important one)
> it's already implemented in my favorite client :-) .  Are there
>  plans to update mutt and elm to support RFC 2015?

RFC 2015 is supported by butt, as well as application/pgp (with
a note about it being heavily discouraged). Don't know about elm.

Sam

--=20
Sam Roberts, sroberts at uniserve dot com, www.emyr.net/Sam

--bUstQoaYUbHimb7n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (QNX)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5sZB3vXDyoMMkV34RAqa0AJwPxYbVci1wMAkorkz81HRkbGOgMgCgiA2i
7nD7w89USMR+FBGVenBSSwo=
=RBRS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bUstQoaYUbHimb7n--