A few bugs with GnuPG 1.0.6 on Digital Unix
Tim Mooney
mooney@dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu
Fri Jun 8 18:38:01 2001
In regard to: A few bugs with GnuPG 1.0.6 on Digital Unix, Chris Adams said...:
>Also, configure.in doesn't know how to build dynamic modules on Digital
>Unix:
You can leave off the $CFLAGS_PIC for DU, since there are no PIC flags needed
on alpha-osf -- Everything is PIC. You wildcarded the first part though,
so maybe it's safer to leave it on for now.
>************************************************************************
>diff -urN gnupg-1.0.6-dist/configure.in gnupg-1.0.6/configure.in
>--- gnupg-1.0.6-dist/configure.in Mon May 28 07:46:13 2001
>+++ gnupg-1.0.6/configure.in Fri Jun 8 10:41:16 2001
>@@ -280,6 +280,10 @@
> DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS="-shared $CFLAGS_PIC"
> ;;
>
>+ *-dec-osf*)
>+ DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS="-shared $CFLAGS_PIC"
>+ ;;
>+
> *)
> NAME_OF_DEV_RANDOM="/dev/random"
> NAME_OF_DEV_URANDOM="/dev/urandom"
>************************************************************************
>
>With those patches, it builds and runs fine.
I thought I had submitted a patch for that back in the 1.0.2 timeframe,
but maybe not. Here's the patch I use for DU/Tru64, IRIX, and HP-UX.
I haven't tested the HP-UX one in a long time, it might not be quite right,
but it's a start.
What options did you use when you configured gnupg?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney mooney@dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
diff -ur gnupg-1.0.2c.orig/configure.in gnupg-1.0.2c/configure.in
--- gnupg-1.0.2c.orig/configure.in Thu Sep 14 07:20:26 2000
+++ gnupg-1.0.2c/configure.in Mon Sep 18 17:53:54 2000
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -w"
fi
;;
+ *-dec-osf5*)
+ if test -z "$GCC" ; then
+ # Use the newer compiler `-msg_disable ptrmismatch' to
+ # get rid of the unsigned/signed char mismatch warnings.
+ # Using this may hide other pointer mismatch warnings, but
+ # it at least lets other warning classes through
+ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -msg_disable ptrmismatch"
+ fi
+ ;;
m68k-atari-mint)
;;
*)
@@ -254,10 +263,41 @@
dnl Fixme: Are these the best flags for OpenBSD????
case "${target}" in
+
+ hpux*)
+ # if using the vendor (ANSI) compiler, arrange to have `-b'
+ # passed to the linker. If using gcc, it supports `-shared' to
+ # do the same.
+ if test -n "$GCC" ; then
+ DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS="-shared $CFLAGS_PIC"
+ else
+ DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS='-Wl,-b'
+ fi
+ ;;
+
+ *-irix6.5*)
+ # Irix 6.5 (and probably a lot earlier, but I only still have
+ # access to 6.5.x) doesn't require any additional flags, as `-KPIC'
+ # is the default.
+ # Also, `-shared' works with the vendor compiler
+ DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS="-shared"
+ ;;
+
*-openbsd*)
NAME_OF_DEV_RANDOM="/dev/srandom"
NAME_OF_DEV_URANDOM="/dev/urandom"
DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS="-shared -rdynamic $CFLAGS_PIC -Wl,-Bshareable -Wl,-x"
+ ;;
+
+ alpha*-dec-osf*)
+ # osf (i.e. OSF/1, Digital UNIX, or Tru64 UNIX, pick any one...)
+ # on alpha doesn't require any PIC flags, everything is PIC.
+ # This may not be the case for osf ports to other machines, so
+ # hence the more specific match for target.
+ #
+ # Also, `-shared' works with the vendor compiler or gcc.
+ # -expect_unresolved turns off warnings about unresolved symbols.
+ DYNLINK_MOD_CFLAGS='-shared -Wl,-expect_unresolved,\*'
;;
*-netbsd*)