integrating GPG with deniable steganography

[Taral]

--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 06:12:23PM -0800, tftp wrote:
> If someone sends you a message encrypted to a key that you really do not
> have... then you probably are out of luck, to put it mildly. There is no
> way to prove that you don't have the key! What a way to frame people!
> Does the RIP bill has any safeguards against that?

Just to put a word in here... It has been noted that despite the wording
of the law, no sane court will punish a person for failure to reveal
something which the government has not reasonably shown to exist.
Criminal standards of proof still apply.

--=20
Taral <taral@taral.net>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity."

--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjq40rwACgkQ7rh4CE+nYEl9JgCfdD6u6IM1QhRBWadZzDjTpxj9
fxYAoNhLOgRSr1tCQshIE/waviu7fqQz
=G0nX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2--