Long Key Performance
David Shaw
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Fri Apr 19 21:32:01 CEST 2002
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:07:00AM -0700, Anonymous wrote:
> It seems really weird to me that the gpg team has decided it's somehow
> sinful for people to use long keys. If they want to, why not let
> them?
GnuPG does let them. It asks that they consider what they are doing
first, but then lets them do whatever they want.
> 3. The key database is extremely slow. On my machine it seems to
> search only 150 keys/second or so. It's somewhat amusing that long
> keys are considered a serious performance problem, but retrieving keys
> off the disk is apparently not.
It was considered a serious performance problem. 1.0.7 has a brand
new trust database that's extremely fast.
Let's try and drag this back to what the actual problem is. You want
GnuPG to be able to make big keys - no problem, it can. You want
GnuPG to be able to use big keys - no problem, it can. It seems you
just don't like the wording of the warning message.
David
--
David Shaw | dshaw at jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list