Long Key Performance

Enzo Michelangeli em at who.net
Sat Apr 20 14:06:01 CEST 2002

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anonymous" <anonymous at anonymizer.com>
To: <gnupg-devel at gnupg.org>
Sent: Saturday, 20 April, 2002 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: Long Key Performance

> FYI, I *am* going to get what I want.  The only question is whether it
> happens via gpg or something else.

Rather than forking gpg, which would worsen the already bad situation of
interoperability among PGP-ish products, you may want to consider Pegwit
v.9: NIST-recommended GF(2^233) ECC key exchange / ECDSA signatures, SHA-256
hash and Rijndael bulk enciphering. All (hopefully) unencumbered by patents,
and available in beta for UNIX and Windows from
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pegwit/ and http://disastry.dhs.org/pegwit/9/


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list