gpg doesn't recognize some sigs created with Emacs

Enzo Michelangeli Enzo Michelangeli" <em@em.no-ip.com
Thu Dec 12 01:17:02 2002


If Werner's UA sent a QP-encoded message (with "Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Quoted-Printable" header) it should also have escaped the '=' as '=3D',
preventing confusion at MTA (or receiving UA) level. It might be that
Sendmail assume QP-encoding also without the appropriate header, but it
would be a rather glaring bug...

Enzo

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Shaw" <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
To: <gnupg-devel@gnupg.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: gpg doesn't recognize some sigs created with Emacs


> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:58:22PM +0000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:57:22PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> > > The signature ended in a padding character (=); maybe Mutt takes this
> > > as QP and gets lost because a LF and no hex characters follow.  Just
guessing.
> >
> > Possibly, given:
> > | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > that came from that message.
>
> The message that I received was:
>
>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> It looks like sendmail is the culprit:
>
>  X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
walrus.jabberwocky.com id gBBEEq825598
>
> David
>
> --
>    David Shaw  |  dshaw@jabberwocky.com  |  WWW
http://www.jabberwocky.com/
>
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
>    "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
>       We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-devel mailing list
> Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel