gpg doesn't recognize some sigs created with Emacs

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Wed Dec 11 18:59:01 CET 2002


On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:26:49 -0500, David Shaw said:

> It's very strange that I got the mangled signature above, but the list
> archive has it clean:
>   http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2002-December/013170.html

The signature ended in a padding character (=); maybe Mutt takes this
as QP and gets lost because a LF and no hex characters follow.  Just guessing.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner





More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list