gpg doesn't recognize some sigs created with Emacs
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Wed Dec 11 18:59:01 CET 2002
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:26:49 -0500, David Shaw said:
> It's very strange that I got the mangled signature above, but the list
> archive has it clean:
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2002-December/013170.html
The signature ended in a padding character (=); maybe Mutt takes this
as QP and gets lost because a LF and no hex characters follow. Just guessing.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list