New encrypt-files option - CVS code
David Shaw
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Wed Jan 9 20:03:02 CET 2002
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:45:54PM +0100, Timo Schulz wrote:
> On Wed Jan 09 2002; 10:31, David Shaw wrote:
>
> > I was just thinking that when --encrypt-files is given only one
> > argument it almost identical to --encrypt... so why not just rename
> > "--encrypt-files" as "--encrypt" and have one command? It would need
> > a slight tweak to handle stdin, but that's easy. (Would the status
> > stuff cause a problem here?)
>
> Okay, you're right but I think about another stdin handling then
> --encrypt use. It would be very useful to use the similar style
> like verify_files. Then you can put the filenames to stdin and
> if there is no stdin data each given file will be encrypt.
Great idea. This is even better.
David
--
David Shaw | dshaw at jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list