timestamp (0x40) signatures?

[Werner Koch]

On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 00:28:11 +0100 (MET), Rick van Rein said:

> I just noticed that GnuPG is not willing to parse a timestamp signature
> that follows RFC 2440 properly.  In the source I did not find it either,
> so that makes sense.  Shall I make a patchit, or is there a reason not to?

Please send me such a signature so that I can write a test case.  For
larger patches we need papers (> ~10 lines total), so it might be
easier if we write it.

  Werner

-- 
Werner Koch        Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH      et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions                                        -- Augustinus