Compiling gpgmeplug in Debian package, and libtool problem
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
jose@jaimedelamo.eu.org
Mon Nov 25 21:00:02 2002
--ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:31:47PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:56:42 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann said:
>=20
> > Well, one solution is to split off gpgmeplug into a different source
> > package, that build depends on gpgme. The reason that gpgmeplug exists=
in
>=20
> We should do this ASAP. Bugs in gpgmeplug require us to release an
> entire new gpgme library which is a bit inconvenient.
>=20
> Marcus, can you please do this.
OH! That would be great. The security concern I had is that not
hardcoding in the libs the path to the gpgme libs could lead in some
systems to an attack based in changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH, or something
similar.
When you split it, I would like to receive a note. I can package both
for Debian.
Thanks
--=20
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
jsogo@debian.org
--ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE94oFwS+BYJZB4jhERAgDYAJ9ckd+mq5OAbUgm5ENmLnQbF+jpRgCaAiGJ
GzVblm33setYMvXYOKBsQTo=
=XYA8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd--