-lresolv, designated revoker with GnuPG 1.1.92

Jason Harris jharris at widomaker.com
Fri Sep 13 20:54:01 CEST 2002

On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:26:16AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:36:06PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:

> > Doh!  I forgot to mention this before:  -lresolv isn't needed for FreeBSD.
> What did ./configure display for the "Checking whether LDAP via "xxxx"
> is present and sane" line?  Is the issue here that configure included
> -lresolv, and it wasn't necessary but it caused no harm (aside from
> the obvious linking to something unneeded)?

With -lresolv, gpgkeys_ldap isn't built on FreeBSD.  There is no

> > Also, should a valid revocation signature made by a designated revoker
> > be followed by "-" instead of "!":
> Cosmetic bug.  Fixed.

(Cool, now I won't have to look for "[revoked]."  :)


Jason Harris          | NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com | web:  http://jharris.cjb.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20020913/b3ac5205/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list