Minor fixes for GnuPG 1.2.3
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Dec 8 10:28:07 CET 2003
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:13:50 -0500, David Shaw said:
> I don't know either. The comment in types.h suggests that it might be
> a compiler thing? Perhaps Stefan Bellon knows more. I hope this isn't
Our "byte" typedef must be an unsigned char. Everything else would
break the code at many places. IIRC, that compiler uses unsigned char
anyway.
Werner
--
Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org>
The GnuPG Experts http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe http://fsfeurope.org
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list