Minor fixes for GnuPG 1.2.3

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Mon Dec 8 10:28:07 CET 2003


On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:13:50 -0500, David Shaw said:

> I don't know either.  The comment in types.h suggests that it might be
> a compiler thing?  Perhaps Stefan Bellon knows more. I hope this isn't

Our "byte" typedef must be an unsigned char.  Everything else would
break the code at many places.  IIRC, that compiler uses unsigned char
anyway.

  Werner

-- 
Werner Koch                                      <wk at gnupg.org>
The GnuPG Experts                                http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe                  http://fsfeurope.org




More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list