GPGME 0.4.1 -- compile hassles

Bernhard Reiter bernhard@intevation.de
Tue Jul 22 15:39:01 2003


--gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:58:12PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:48:15PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:

> Ok.  Is it fixed in CVS now?
> Right.  I fixed that now in CVS (hopefully).

Thanks for the answer.
Note: I probably won't be able to test CVS in the near future.

> > 	Fixing the hassles above all 15 tests fails with:
> > 	t-encrypt.c:42: GPGME: Invalid crypto engine
>=20
> It works just fine for me, of course.  So maybe there is a problem with y=
our
> configuration?  What is your GnuPG version?  1.2.2 is required.

With 1.2.3rc1 all tests passed fine.

The configuration output had confused me.
It told me the path to gnupg and a minimum version number,
so I was surprise that it did not check the minimum version number
of that found executable.
Wouldn't that we a good idea to check for the minium version
number for gpg and gpgsm and issue a warning in the configuration step?

> > ps.: Please cc: me on relevant replies, I'm not subscribed to gnupg-dev=
el@.
> Mmh, maybe fix your Mail-Followup-To then :)

Many people don't pay attentions to the mail-followup-to,
thus I'd rather make it double sure.

--gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/HTw/h9ag3dpKERYRAkMTAJ4qKYiz2GHbaY7DW8gs5BAPIPkGZQCgq9ZP
eTQ0QrX8ncc/JqIxMiEAmS8=
=Ocl5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts--