GPGME 0.4.1 -- compile hassles

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at
Tue Jul 29 15:11:01 CEST 2003

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:53:20PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > Thanks for the answer.
> > Note: I probably won't be able to test CVS in the near future.
> Is that a problem of getting at the changes in CVS or something different? 
> If it is the former, I could email you the patches.

Just the normal timeconstraints on my part...

> > Wouldn't that we a good idea to check for the minium version
> > number for gpg and gpgsm and issue a warning in the configuration step?
> Well, yeah, it could do that.  But it can only be a warning because the
> machine you compile GPGME on doesn't even need to have gpg or gpgsm
> installed (unless you want to run the test suite).  But as I have to check
> for running the test suite anyway, I can add a check.  The check would
> disable the test suite if no suitable gpg is found.

A warning, but a big one, should be fine. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20030729/16a17120/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list