Problems with listing secret keys in GnuPG 1.2.1
David Shaw
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Mon Jun 16 00:15:03 CEST 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:14:24AM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Do you have those backwards? The listing when you give the username
> > should be the first example, not the second.
>
> Not as far as I know. Unfortunately, the box I did the manual copy from is
> unavailable. Another box, with almost exactly the same private keyring
> (it's missing a UID I added to the other one), gives the following.
> (Unfortunately, my $%&(! Win32 ssh client doesn't support cut-and-paste, so
> once more this is all manual entry--apologies if I miss a colon or
> something.)
Okay, just making sure. The example you give in this email confirms
what I see as well.
This is resolved in 1.2.3 by not giving validity information in the
with-colons secret key listing. The proper resolution (to give the
validity information of the corresponding public key) will be in 2.0.
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-cvs (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc
iD8DBQE+7OHw4mZch0nhy8kRAp5nAKC837uWCVVgRiBSoPgVWIJk4USZ3QCff14H
lMXFPb2byU5WUa/qFJCKVIo=
=Y7Wh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list