Keylistings very slow in 1.2.2
Miguel Coca
mcoca at gnu.org
Sat May 10 16:56:01 CEST 2003
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 18:06:36 -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:39:24AM +0200, Miguel Coca wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I reported this yesterday as a Debian bug, but after compiling my own
> > builds of 1.2.1 and 1.2.2, I've realized it's not Debian specific.
> >
> > In gpg 1.2.2, doing a --with-colons keylist takes over 30 times longer
> > than it used to in 1.2.1. I couldn't find anything in the release
> > notes about this, so I expect it's not a known effect of any change.
>
> It is an unfortunate bug. It is already fixed in CVS and will be part
> of the next release.
I just verified the fix. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
--
Miguel Coca (mcoca at gnu.org) http://zipi.fi.upm.es/~e970095/
OpenPGP: E60A CBF4 5C6F 914E B6C1 C402 8C4D C7B6 27FC 3CA8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20030510/a9ef4f0a/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list