Signature on article is BAD in GnuPG and Good in PGP

[Adrian von Bidder]

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:02, ls+gnupg.devel.gnupg.org at gambit.com.ru 
wrote:
> Dear developers!
>
> I just found an article news:1992Dec20.102732.11494 at extropia.wimsey.bc.ca
> which has "BAD signature" in GnuPG 1.2.3 and "Good signature" in PGP 6.5.8.
>
> Can you reproduce this problem?

The included news article had a good signature by key 0x37E8E343 - but your 
email (signed by 0xF7D43E93CF017E57) as a whole was reported BAD by kmail.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
When you go into court you are putting your fate into the hands of twelve
people who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.
		-- Norm Crosby
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 331 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031118/bd4855b6/attachment.bin