Signature on article is BAD in GnuPG and Good in PGP
Adrian von Bidder
avbidder at fortytwo.ch
Tue Nov 18 16:55:13 CET 2003
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:02, ls+gnupg.devel.gnupg.org at gambit.com.ru
> Dear developers!
> I just found an article news:1992Dec20.102732.11494 at extropia.wimsey.bc.ca
> which has "BAD signature" in GnuPG 1.2.3 and "Good signature" in PGP 6.5.8.
> Can you reproduce this problem?
The included news article had a good signature by key 0x37E8E343 - but your
email (signed by 0xF7D43E93CF017E57) as a whole was reported BAD by kmail.
When you go into court you are putting your fate into the hands of twelve
people who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.
-- Norm Crosby
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 331 bytes
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031118/bd4855b6/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-devel