gpg or gpgme?
jrevusky at telefonica.net
Wed Nov 26 19:51:59 CET 2003
I posted this question earlier to gpg-user, and didn't get much of a
response. I apologize to people who are on both lists and are seeing
I have been charged with the task of creating a java wrapper API around
When I saw that there was a shared library gpgme, and that it was in
principle "made easy", I thought that the best thing to do would be to
use JNI (Java native interface) to call routines in the gpgme shared
library. However, once I realized that gpgme simply invokes in turn the
gpg executable, and given the extreme PITA that working with JNI is, it
now seems to be that the most appealing approach is just to use
interprocess communication and invoke the gpg executable from java.
All that said, I would really appreciate any feedback on this topic. Are
there advantages to using gpgme in this case that I am unaware of? I
understand that, in principle, if you have other crypto
engines/back-ends supported by gpgme, then an app that uses gpgme will
automatically support those back-ends. But I don't think this is so
important for us. Are there other aspects of this that I'm missing?
More information about the Gnupg-devel