gpg or gpgme?

[Jonathan Revusky]

Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:51:59 +0100, Jonathan Revusky said:
> 
> 
>>automatically support those back-ends. But I don't think this is so
>>important for us. Are there other aspects of this that I'm missing?
> 
> 
> Eventually gpg will support a server mode like gpgsm now does.  This
> reduced the overhead of the fork/exec and also allows to better check
> the validity of the recipients.

That is quite interesting, but you say above that gpg will support a 
server mode, so we would be able to take advantage of that (when it 
exists) without using gpgme, right?

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
>   Werner
> 
>