1.3.6 cert signatures

[Atom 'Smasher']

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:50:41PM -0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:

>> should "personal-digest-preferences" affect cert signatures?
>>
>> or is that too broad an interpretation of the intent?
>
> Yes.  Changing the digest for cert signatures is something that GnuPG
> supports for protocol completeness, but it's one of those things that
> you should never do unless you really, really know what you are doing.
> And even then you probably shouldn't do it.
====================

what problems should i expect if i use SHA-256 on keybinding and cert 
signatures? (aside from the obvious, that some older implementations won't 
be able to handle it)


         ...atom

  _________________________________________
  PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
  762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
  -------------------------------------------------

 	"Maybe this world is another planet's Hell."
 		-- Aldous Huxley
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBAd7MAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciOfEH/jSHHSFVMv7LbWTkdsuJeKRh
jA5FdrwRbusEMB6+8esvYJnuHT9JyMQNv7AqqPXG7nlSR3EHLOfAEMBzX2OyzWbo
u2Re9IhOKxsugG4w8pguE7JiBKau5XGYYu17EF+m+bDVU0bNsbSNYG7/AE6cjCRo
1wDS1s+l9+4/9Z0CU4acs6AqX8SRPOj6/oWVTnUbtn+y/Srj7w9ApeEnl2FP7sC0
ZyU4aS4vX4UYEuhXsHbOyHqPidtfqaVxDiS8Vd9+1suIPqsET52lRVkcNW5t8fkb
GxK5+pbwEWpGpGdovvnWkmJn5lxqYIkfWLg2bSSVyT2pUeJrlnsXpxRNYbaGMSE=
=bssx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----